I know that every vote that the Greens gets gives them money to put forward their ideas – which is obviously good – but we know how voting for Greens just takes away a vote from someone who might actually win.
I suggest that several days before the election have the candidates declare that they want the voter to vote for someone who can win.
Let’s suppose that you personally said “In the antiquated electoral system we have, the reality is that I cannot win this riding because of First-Past-The-Post. The Liberals and NDP have promised to bring in Proportional Representation. Hold your nose and vote them in and keep their feet to the fire so that the next time you vote Green, your vote will actually count.”
Sadly, the Conservatives repealed the law that provided the per-vote subsidy. And campaign expenses are reimbursable only if the party receives some 15% of the vote. So while a single vote is no longer a direct benefit to the Greens, a mass of votes will go a long way to defraying election expenses.
It is a common fallacy that Greens are not electable. But there are Green members in the provincial legislatures in BC, PEI, NB and the Whitehorse council, not to mention Elizabeth May with a seat in the federal parliament.
It is also a common fallacy that the Greens split the vote. In the ridings where Greens do well it is because they’re attracting people who don’t otherwise vote. The larger the voter turnout, the better Greens do. So, they’re not taking votes away from other parties. And in ridings where Greens don’t do well their portion of the vote is so small it makes no difference to the outcome. You’re better off convincing the NDP to vote Liberal, or the Liberals to vote NDP.
Please check these two videos. The first is very accessible, and shows graphically how Green votes aren’t split votes. The second video delves into the math, showing that Green votes are statistically too small to affect the balance of power in parliament.
As you’ve told me, people should vote for the candidate who will best represent them in their riding. If you vote for a candidate you don’t like just to keep out a candidate you like even less, you’ll only get a government you don’t like. When a candidate retracts his candidacy it is unfair to the voters who no longer have that party as a choice; it is unfair to the party’s supporters in that riding, who may have made financial contributions and burned shoeleather canvassing door-to-door; and it is unfair to the party itself, which has provided technical, legal, and moral support, and possibly financial support as well.
Retracting candidacy weakens the party, so that the issues it raises will be taken even less seriously in the next election. You may have noticed that both the NDP and the Liberals are promoting their ‘green policies’ — lifted directly from the Green Party platform since 1983! This would never have happened if they didn’t consider the Green Party as a viable alternative, a real threat to their own hegemony! If they can weaken the Green Party they won’t have to have green policies, and they’ll go back to their earth-destroying policies you so abhor.
The Greens may not win this election, and I have no illusions about winning in my riding. The Conservatives won here with a majority of the votes, and the Greens were solidly in fourth place. The Greens may not win but by running, the Greens force the other parties to implement green policies. The whole point of the global Green movement is to make this Earth a better place, and if the other parties can be made to do that, even for the wrong reasons, it’s still mission accomplished.
My final word on strategic voting: It doesn’t work. There were two national campaigns in the 2011 election: a vote swapping scheme run by
Lead Now , and a cooperative voting campaign by Catch-22. There is no evidence that either campaign or strategic voting in general had any effect at all. In fact, just the opposite — the Conservatives went from a minority position to a majority.
Vote for the candidate who will best represent you in your riding. Even if that candidate does not win, I guarantee you’ll sleep better at night knowing you did the right thing.
Added 13 September 2015: The Catch-22 website no longer exists. Read the Rabble.ca article by Gary Shaul, Catch 22 Campaign website shutting down.
This could not have been written better than if it had been written by Harper himself. It uses exactly the same logic as Stephen Harper uses with climate change. Canada’s impact on the climate is way too small to have any impact at all, so why bother doing anything when all it is going to do is damage our economy and not make any difference in the long run. When
You have a major problem in the world, we all have to band together to defeat it regardless of how much we can contribute. Once we have achieved that first goal them we can go back to our individual efforts. Shame on you for not seeing the forest for the trees and falling right into the outstretched arms of conservative strategists!!!!
You must be directing your comments to the person who suggested I retract my candidacy. I’m not doing that, I am banding together with all Green minded people to save both the forest and the trees.
Bob, Thanks for providing a clear articulation of why voting Green does not “split the vote.” You have addressed what has been a concern of mine. And you have provided data to support your reasoned approach.
I would also say there are people who typically vote Conservative, who respect Green economic policy and are looking for a new political home. So Greens pull votes from all three of the old Parties.
Thanks of your courage and hope for a strong, fair and healthy Canada.
What an excellent article, and I’m not biased even a little…
[Full disclosure: Bob’s my husband 😀 ]
One of the reasons the Canadian political system is such a mess today is certainly because so many Canadians have realized just how unaccountable our government is, and how terribly unfair our electoral system is, without realizing there is a way to fix it. It’s been at least a decade since “strategic voting” became accepted in the mainstream as a legitimate way to vote. And so more and more Canadians try to game the broken system by voting strategically, but as you say, it never actually works… all it does is make it even harder to tell what Canadians actually want. Thanks for writing this!
saw your comment on the video , good stuff that you even paid attention to something like that , busy making hundreds of comments on others threads atm will give a full comment later hopefully i can edit this post instead of having to make a new one….